← West Lindsey (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

West Lindsey 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

9 ward races
9 seats
2 elected below the proportional quota
22.2% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share that would be needed to be guaranteed that seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the gap as points under par — the editorial indictment. Above-par results are just majority mandates and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 9 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 9 seats had been allocated to those vote totals in proportion (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented in this council, negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative and Unionist Party12,19450.8%666.7%555.6%+1
Liberal Democrats6,17025.7%333.3%333.3%0
Labour Party2,97512.4%00.0%111.1%-1
Independent1,4296.0%00.0%00.0%0
LINCS IND8503.5%00.0%00.0%0
Green Party2200.9%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK1580.7%00.0%00.0%0
Total23,996100.0%9100.0%9100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Scotter Rural · single-seat

Marginal winner 38.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference +11.1 pts below quota Valid ballots 2,712

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Perraton-Williams C.L.Conservative and Unionist Party1,05438.9%Elected
2Rollings L.A.Liberal Democrats99236.6%
3Howitt-Cowan P.D.J.Independent39014.4%
4Adderley R.A.Labour Party27610.2%

Electorate 8,221 · Ballots cast 2,712 · EC ward code E58000935 · Back to ward index

Market Rasen Wolds · single-seat

Marginal winner 45.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference +4.3 pts below quota Valid ballots 3,240

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Bunney S.Liberal Democrats1,48045.7%Elected
2Coulson T.J.Conservative and Unionist Party1,46645.2%
3Saywell C.Labour Party2949.1%

Electorate 9,047 · Ballots cast 3,240 · EC ward code E58000927 · Back to ward index

Welton Rural · single-seat

Marginal winner 56.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −6.0 pts Valid ballots 3,077

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Rawlins S.Conservative and Unionist Party1,72456.0%Elected
2Rodgers D.M.Independent68422.2%
3Bond D.P.Labour Party44514.5%
4Taylor N.Liberal Democrats2247.3%

Electorate 8,843 · Ballots cast 3,077 · EC ward code E58000954 · Back to ward index

Gainsborough Trent · single-seat

Marginal winner 58.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −8.9 pts Valid ballots 1,869

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Young T.V.Liberal Democrats1,10058.9%Elected
2Key P.M.Independent35519.0%
3Ashby L.V.Conservative and Unionist Party25013.4%
4Smith P.P.Labour Party1648.8%

Electorate 7,503 · Ballots cast 1,869 · EC ward code E58000909 · Back to ward index

North Wolds · single-seat

Marginal winner 59.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −9.7 pts Valid ballots 2,825

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Smith T.J.N.Conservative and Unionist Party1,68659.7%Elected
2Reece L.A.Liberal Democrats72025.5%
3Green B.Labour Party41914.8%

Electorate 8,602 · Ballots cast 2,825 · EC ward code E58000930 · Back to ward index

Gainsborough Hill · single-seat

Marginal winner 61.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −11.2 pts Valid ballots 1,483

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Boles M.D.Liberal Democrats90861.2%Elected
2Bibb S.C.Conservative and Unionist Party31621.3%
3Hancock M.Labour Party15510.5%
4O'Connor P.J.Reform UK1047.0%

Electorate 7,114 · Ballots cast 1,483 · EC ward code E58000907 · Back to ward index

Bardney & Cherry Willingham · single-seat

Marginal winner 61.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −11.7 pts Valid ballots 2,804

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Fleetwood I.G.Conservative and Unionist Party1,73161.7%Elected
2Darcel C.J.LINCS IND62822.4%
3Jennings S.F.Labour Party39113.9%
4Jackson B.R.Reform UK541.9%

Electorate 8,397 · Ballots cast 2,804 · EC ward code E58000887 · Back to ward index

Gainsborough Rural South · single-seat

Marginal winner 66.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −16.0 pts Valid ballots 2,900

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Butroid R.D.Conservative and Unionist Party1,91566.0%Elected
2Cox T.W.Labour Party49517.1%
3Velan B.Liberal Democrats2689.2%
4Connell Q.M.LINCS IND2227.7%

Electorate 8,358 · Ballots cast 2,900 · EC ward code E58000908 · Back to ward index

Nettleham & Saxilby · single-seat

Marginal winner 66.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −16.5 pts Valid ballots 3,086

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Brockway J.Conservative and Unionist Party2,05266.5%Elected
2White A.M.Liberal Democrats47815.5%
3Green M.A.Labour Party33610.9%
4Loryman B.J.L.Green Party2207.1%

Electorate 8,285 · Ballots cast 3,086 · EC ward code E58000929 · Back to ward index