← Uttlesford (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

Uttlesford 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

4 ward races
4 seats
3 elected below the proportional quota
75.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share that would be needed to be guaranteed that seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the gap as points under par — the editorial indictment. Above-par results are just majority mandates and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 4 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 4 seats had been allocated to those vote totals in proportion (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented in this council, negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative and Unionist Party10,52539.5%250.0%250.0%0
RES9,73236.5%250.0%250.0%0
Liberal Democrats2,83810.7%00.0%00.0%0
Green Party1,8296.9%00.0%00.0%0
Labour Party1,7236.5%00.0%00.0%0
Total26,647100.0%4100.0%4100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Stansted · single-seat

Marginal winner 38.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference +12.0 pts below quota Valid ballots 6,705

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Gooding R.Conservative and Unionist Party2,54738.0%Elected
2Donald B.M.RES1,98429.6%
3Khan A.Liberal Democrats1,37220.5%
4Gold D.A.Green Party4076.1%
5Naik S.D.Labour Party3955.9%

Electorate 16,722 · Ballots cast 6,705 · EC ward code E58000459 · Back to ward index

Thaxted · single-seat

Marginal winner 39.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference +10.2 pts below quota Valid ballots 5,704

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Foley M.L.RES2,27039.8%Elected
2Walsh S.M.Conservative and Unionist Party2,17638.1%
3Silcock R.Liberal Democrats60610.6%
4Allington P.H.Green Party3826.7%
5Young A.Labour Party2704.7%

Electorate 14,757 · Ballots cast 5,704 · EC ward code E58001758 · Back to ward index

Saffron Walden · single-seat

Marginal winner 43.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference +6.1 pts below quota Valid ballots 7,272

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Gadd P.D.RES3,19543.9%Elected
2Moran J.M.Conservative and Unionist Party2,26831.2%
3Sampson A.M.Labour Party6368.7%
4Gildea E.V.Green Party6278.6%
5Ede S.M.Liberal Democrats5467.5%

Electorate 16,931 · Ballots cast 7,272 · EC ward code E58000454 · Back to ward index

Dunmow · single-seat

Marginal winner 50.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −0.7 pts Valid ballots 6,966

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Barker S.Conservative and Unionist Party3,53450.7%Elected
2Bagnall G.RES2,28332.8%
3Darcy G.W.Labour Party4226.1%
4Radford M.M.Green Party4135.9%
5Flawn L.A.Liberal Democrats3144.5%

Electorate 20,456 · Ballots cast 6,966 · EC ward code E58001757 · Back to ward index