← Ribble Valley (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

Ribble Valley 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

4 ward races
4 seats
1 elected below the proportional quota
25.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share that would be needed to be guaranteed that seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the gap as points under par — the editorial indictment. Above-par results are just majority mandates and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 4 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 4 seats had been allocated to those vote totals in proportion (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented in this council, negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative and Unionist Party9,21853.1%4100.0%375.0%+1
Labour Party3,09017.8%00.0%125.0%-1
Liberal Democrats2,12912.3%00.0%00.0%0
Independent1,6949.8%00.0%00.0%0
Green Party1,2297.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total17,360100.0%4100.0%4100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Clitheroe · single-seat

Marginal winner 29.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference +20.2 pts below quota Valid ballots 4,399

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Hind S.Conservative and Unionist Party1,31329.8%Elected
2O'Rourke S.M.Liberal Democrats1,30129.6%
3Brown I.F.Independent84219.1%
4Graveston M.S.J.Labour Party73616.7%
5Peplow M.C.Green Party2074.7%

Electorate 12,977 · Ballots cast 4,399 · EC ward code E58000769 · Back to ward index

Ribble Valley North East · single-seat

Marginal winner 53.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −3.0 pts Valid ballots 4,817

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Mirfin G.Conservative and Unionist Party2,55553.0%Elected
2McNamara A.Labour Party86918.0%
3Birtwhistle D.Independent85217.7%
4McCrum G.T.Green Party3126.5%
5Robinson M.Liberal Democrats2294.8%

Electorate 12,611 · Ballots cast 4,817 · EC ward code E58000813 · Back to ward index

Longridge With Bowland · single-seat

Marginal winner 64.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −14.1 pts Valid ballots 3,697

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Swarbrick R.K.Conservative and Unionist Party2,37064.1%Elected
2Barnsley K.P.Labour Party74620.2%
3Yates P.R.Green Party37910.3%
4O'Rourke D.L.Liberal Democrats2025.5%

Electorate 11,233 · Ballots cast 3,697 · EC ward code E58000786 · Back to ward index

Ribble Valley South West · single-seat

Marginal winner 67.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Difference −17.0 pts Valid ballots 4,447

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareElected
1Schofield A.Conservative and Unionist Party2,98067.0%Elected
2Jameson L.C.Labour Party73916.6%
3Hymas J.Liberal Democrats3978.9%
4Peplow A.E.Green Party3317.4%

Electorate 11,717 · Ballots cast 4,447 · EC ward code E58000814 · Back to ward index